A Tale of Two Friends

A Tale of Two Friends.

Obama, Why Not Tell Black Americans to go Back to Pre-1965 Civil Rights Act?

 

Since President Obama’s leftist/socialist internationalist philosophy assumes Israel’s pre-1967 borderline past is a better place for Jews to live, why not tell American Blacks to return to the pre-1965 Civil Rights Act era?    

That analogy is not hyperbole.  It is no different from what Obama did in his his speech last Thursday by demanding Israel’s culture and existence return to the pre-1967 past when Israel was completely unprotected from those who hate Jews and want their kind extinct. 

Of course, Obama did not place these demands on those committing violence in the Middle East.  Instead, Obama called the violence    in the Middle East and North Africa (Egyptian protests and Arab Spring) “an extraordinary thing,” because:

 The people [of these Arab nations] have risen up to demand their basic human rights.

 

Do you mean the way Jews did after the Holocaust, when Hitler tried to exterminate an entire race of human beings?  How about now, when Israel asks for peace, but Arabs refuse human rights to Jews by blowing up Israeli cafes and buses? 

Those whom Obama claim want basic human rights, seek Israel and Jews extermination.  These so-called human rights protesters supported Hitler’s extermination of Jews, not peace.  Palestinians have not sought, nor worked, toward an era where Jews and Arabs live side-by-side in peace, Israel has.  The nations Obama speaks of want Muslim Brotherhood leadership versus freedom, democracy, and peace.

Israel never took any human rights away from Muslims; Islam has done that to its own people.  Most Arabs want Jews dead, and have constantly attacked Israel  in an attempt to complete that process, and Obama knows this. The reason behind his rhetoric is leftist political correct appeasement toward Islam.  This is why Obama calls violent protests, that perpetrated rape and murder, an “extraordinary thing.” 

Obama, who loves to invoke his father’s struggle as a black African coming to America, working hard to beat the odds in an era when segregation still existed in many parts of America, doesn’t give a damn about Israel’s continuous struggle against people who have wanted Jews enslaved and murdered for the past 5,000 years.  Obama treats Israel’s violent enemies as victims and Israel as the occupying bully.  So his rhetoric toward Israel is not surprising; as I stated above, Obama’s a socialist.  His politics are pro-Islamic, not human rights. When Islam erupts in violence, Obama doesn’t care about threats to Israel.  Like all leftists, Obama hopes this radical movement will continue its destructive force, eradicating Israel’s land and a military.  Then the left can finally regulate those nasty Jews into Islamic leftist government intervention by-way-of imposed submission. 

Obama may talk about basic human rights, but it’s just that–talk. His entire speech was a demand that Israel go backward in time to an era that lacked complete self-defense against Arabs who want Jews dead.  That’s not the creation of  human rights, it’s disaster.

Not according to Obama, who falsely claimed rioting Arab nations are part of America’s “economics,” “history and faith.” Obama did say the same of Israel– later in the speech–but his claims that America shares the same history and faith as Arab nations is a clever tactic to make Americans feel guilty about  Middle Eastern violence: blame it all on Israel’s existence and America’s actual Judeo-Christian history and faith linked with Israel and Jews. 

It’s easy to accomplish if one uses human rights as the tactic to blame Israel. This way we can stir up anti-Semitic emotions and tell Israel to go to hell and leave  poor, violent Islam alone. 

Obama knows Israel  has always sought to negotiate peace treatise with Palestinian neighbors.  But Obama sides with the antiSemitic/anti-West violence going on in the Middle East and North Africa.  He agrees with Muslim Arab extremists beliefs—death and destruction.  That’s because his ideology is the left.

The tone of Obama’s speech was not accidental; it was meant to shove Israel under enemy tanks in order to apologize to Islam for Israel’s existence.  As long as Israel exists, Islam has no chance fir complete takeover of the Middle East, and neither does the left. 

Can one imagine going back to the Jim Crowe era where that view was imposed upon Black Americans? It’s the same.

Taking the guilt and appeasement one step further, Obama’s obnoxiously compared protesting Arab nations to Rosa Parks, saying: “The people of North Africa and the Middle East are casting off their burdens of the past,” actually blaming the burden on America’s support and friendship with Israel:

and it is precisely because of that friendship, it’s important we tell the truth, because the status quo is unsustainable and Israel too must act boldly to achieve lasting peace…the dream of a Jewish and democratic state cannot be fulfilled with permanent occupation…a lasting peace will involve two states for two people—Israel as a Jewish state and a homeland for the Jewish people, and a state of Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people.

 

How this president can make such anti-Civil Rights demands, using Rosa Parks, a segregated black woman, forbidden to sit on the front seat of a bus, because of her race, as his example for the 1976 borderline, is deplorable.  But then again, the status quo is always considered unstable to leftists, who want it changed to government-dominated utopia. That’s why Obama had the gall to say it is “America’s” belief that Israel must comply with the 1967 borderline demands.

Telling Israel to go back to the 1967 borderline is like telling black Americans to go back to the pre-1965 back-of-the-bus era.

What’s next, asking Israelis to re-enslave themselves to Egypt next year on Passover?

Code Pink and Ron Paul: Leftist Bedfellows

That loud-mouthed, radical left-wing brigade of hippie Jew-haters, Code Pink, says they are on the same page with Ron Paul: they support and defend Israel’s enemies. 

This is certainly not a surprise.  Ron Paul and Code Pink blame Israel for Palestinian deaths, both sided with the flotilla that illegally bypassed Israel and entered Gaza.  Both called Israel’s military involvement an invasion against Palestinians, both excused the bloody violence perpetrated by Palestinians against Israeli soldiers, who boarded the flotilla, and both blame Middle East violence and poverty on Israel and America.  

Just compare the two and see they are one-and-the-same– leftists.

Code Pink activist Liz Hurican told Fox News:

The Ron Paul people are closer and closer to our [Code Pink leftist] talking points with each election.

 

Ron Paul Spokeswoman Rachel Mills says Code Pink is actually leaning more in the direction of Ron Paul’s beliefs and politics, saying the Congressman “is in favor of coalition-building” with anti-war groups.

Of course he is.  Anti-war groups hate Israel.  Like Ron Paul, they consider American and Israel murderers, and both Paul and Pink constantly hurl Israel under Hamas tanks.  And we don’t have to look far to compare both to see their views are identical when it comes to Israel, Palestinians, war and America.  

Code Pink co-founder Media Benjamin says:

Unfortunately, the Israelis refuse to let us in.  We feel that on the one year anniversary of the Israeli invasion of Gaza that the governments of the world have abandoned the people of Gaza. They [Palestinians] are still living in a prison, without the ability to move in and out of borders or conduct basic commerce or receive humanitarian aid.  There has been no rebuilding.  We feel it’s our job as world citizens to take a stand and demand justice.

 

Benjamin sounds like the radical Mr. “non-interventionalist,”  who condemned Israel, and America’s support, for the legal blockade, telling Fox News’ Don Imus it was an “atrocious” “act of war.”  Yet, Paul shrewdly disguised his disdain for Israel by saying he “doesn’t want to tell Israel what to do,” “it’s their business.” Ron Paul can’t keep his blame-Israel philosophy silent for long. In the next sentence he pinked up his tone by asserting: “It’s our [American] business [to watch Israel],” because “we’re very close allies with Israel,” and “we finance Israel,” and:

any weapon they use, or ship they won, or plane they own, or threat they make, we back them [Israel] up.  We backed them up on this [flotilla] embargo and the food and medicine going into Gaza.  So we’re morally responsible, and people see us as one and the same.

 

My, how cunning to bring up Israel’s well-equipped army.  I guess America should set Israel free from state-imposed welfare! Israel can defend herself quite well without America sticking her big nose in Israel’s business! Question; if  that money went to Gaza to blow up Israel, would Ron Paul and Code Pink call the bullying Jewish state a victim of violent Islamic extremists funded by America?

It’s amazing how Paul’s anti-Israel speech sneakily depicts reasoning while spewing Jew-hate.  America should not be involved in a  fight or take sides with  two peoples fighting each other for thousands of years! Paul makes the Israeli/Palestinian conflict into nothing more than the feuding Hatfield’s and McCoy’s:    

But I don’t want any of this foreign aid—Pakistan or anybody else—because the principle is wrong and because it doesn’t achieve anything…it’s not like 100 percent of the people in Israel or every Jew in this country believes we should have the foreign policy that we have.

 

Talk about skillful underhanded rhetoric.   It sounds like Ron Paul’s trying protect America’s economic interests. In actuality,  he agrees with the anti-Semitic Code Pink: 

 The Palestinians are virtually in a concentration camp, and they have a few small missiles, but it’s so minor compared to the firepower of Israel, who has nuclear weapons, and they [Israel] can turn off all the food, all the water, and do what they want to the Palestinian people…

 

No one should be surprised Code Pink considers themselves to be on the same page as the radical libertarian.  Code Pink is anti-war, anti-Israel, they want America to end all funding and aid to Israel, while claiming Jews murder Palestinian children.   Code Pink’s site  is no different than Ron Paul’s pro-Palestinian speech: 

Code Pink’s previous delegations found starving kids in need of clean drinking water and working toilets. One year after Israeli air strikes on this tiny strip of densely populated land, there is still a profound lack of medical care as Israel’s blockade is continued. Hospitals and schools were a major target of the IDF, and most people go with limited health care…Among the dead were some 1400 civilians. Thousands more were wounded, most of them civilians, hundreds of them kids.

 Compare this Code Pink stance on Israel to Ron Paul.  They’re alike:

Code Pink believes in the implementation of human rights and international law on both sides,believes in supporting and empowering Palestinian self-determination, but we do not take a stance on a two-state or a one-state solution—it is not within our role as internationals or a U.S. based organization to advocate on behalf of a particular solution on behalf of Palestinians condemns violence against civilians on both sides, but we see the Israeli occupation and the blockade of Gaza as among the root causes of the conflict, and view the end of the Israeli occupation and a lifting of the blockade of Gaza as key steps towards reaching a just and lasting solution. [Code Pink] condemns the use of our national resources to financially and diplomatically support the ongoing occupation and blockade…

 

Notice Pink says they don’t take sides. Ron Paul says the same. And both cleverly condemn Palestinian,violence,  yet, both Ron Paul and Code Pink correlate Muslim violence with Israeli defense, saying Palestinians act the way they do because Israel is an occupier.  

It appears Ron Paul’s Revolution is becoming coded in leftist pink or the other way around. Either way,  Ron Paul and Code Pink are anti-Israel/anti-Semitic, pro-socialist bedfellows doing everything possible to hurl Israel under Hamas tanks.  Both are sleeeping with the enemy.

Sexual-Slavery and Jihadist Breeding Camps: The Women of Osama bin Laden

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/05/19/sexual-slavery-jihadist-breeding-camps-women-osama-bin-laden/

Osama Bin Laden: Al Qaeda’s Dysfunctional Naughty Boy

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/05/06/osama-bin-laden-al-qaeda-dysfunctional-naughty-boy/

Egypt’s New Normal: Pro-Israel Democracy Blogger Sentenced to Prison

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/05/05/egypts-new-normal-pro-israel-pro-democracy-bloggers-go-directly-to-jail/